by Patti Sherry-Crews
"Deliver us from the evils of the dress!" --Annie Jeanness-Miller
Union Suit |
Have you ever looked at photographs of Victorian-era women climbing mountains and wondered how in the world did they manage such strenuous activity wearing those clothes? As ridiculous as those outfits look to us today, the attire available to the active women in the mid 19th century was far less cumbersome than previously, thanks to Annie Jeanness-Miller and other pioneers of the Dress Reform movement.
To put the call for dress reform in context, let's first look at what women were expected to wear earlier. Desired silhouettes changed from time to time, but in the early part of the 19th century, the ideal woman had a teeny, tiny waist and full hips. What nature did not provide, artfully constructed clothing did. Women's undergarments were so many and complicated that a lady sometimes needed assistance to dress herself. The first layer of clothing were bloomers. Next came the chemise. So far not so bad. But then the fashion victim had to be squeezed into a corset which laced in the back (we all have that scene in our heads right now of Scarlett O'Hara, who has been starving herself all morning in preparation for the big party, holding on to a bedpost while Mammy stands behind her lacing her corset--admit it, that's what you were thinking of).
Bloomers, chemise, and corset, but that's not all. We're not dressed yet. Before she could slip into her dress, the lady still had to put on a crinoline to hold the shape of a hoop skirt, and over that were several petticoats. And when it was in fashion, the bustle gave the lady the desired S-shaped profile. Now, go climb that mountain, girl!
Then out of the White Mountains of New Hampshire came Annie Jeanness-Miller, and she was having none of it. Annie, who was related to Oliver Wendell Holmes, was a lecturer and a so-called Women in Letters of the time. In addition to dress reform for women she educated the public on other topics such as social justice and the prevention of disease by using proper hygiene.
Annie felt that restrictive clothing, including enormous hats, put women in a subservient position to men. Her goal was to emancipate the waist! To accomplish this, she published a magazine called Dress and sold patterns for more sensible outfits. Outfits a woman could climb a mountain in. Or go yachting--or play a game of lawn tennis. She even designed a business suit and patented athletic wear for women.
Earlier attempts at dress reform weren't successful but what Jeanness-Miller got right was to stay within the norms of contemporary fashion, so in outward appearance there was nothing radical in her designs. She also included beautiful touches like eyelet lace and ribbons, so her line still had feminine appeal.
The first strike in her war against the corset was the Union Suit (different from Long Johns which are comprised of separate top and bottom. Union Suit meaning the union of top and bottom), and yes it had the "trapdoor." The garment fitted to a women's natural shape and could be made from various material like silk or wool depending on the season. This undergarment eliminated bulky fabric, allowing for more natural movement.
"With the Union Suit all of this is obviated, and a woman becomes a dainty object where formerly she looked as if wrapped in yards of meaningless stuff."--Annie Jeanness-Miller
Next, the Chemilette was worn over the Union Suit to replace the corset.
Chemilette |
And finally came the Model Bodice and the Turkish Leglettes. Notice the exotic names she called her pieces. Annie had quite the flair for marketing.
Turkish Leglettes and Model Bodice |
Of the Turkish Leglettes she reasoned, "Why not a divided garment for clothing women's legs as well as a man's? Nothing in their anatomical construction would suggest any other conclusions; and why, then, clothe them differently when by so clothing them, freedom and grace of movement are both sacrificed."
And furthermore, "The Turkish Leglettes are a great improvement over the petticoat, because they are designed with special regard for the legs. They clothe each separately, and for this reason are much warmer than the petticoat, under which the air circulates freely. Each leg lifts its own weight in walking, so that very great resistance at the ankle and knee from the petticoat is gotten rid of, and in wet weather they do not get dragged and soiled as do the petticoats."
The Union Suit proved to be such a practical garment that men picked up on it. Picked it up to such an extent that now when we think of the Union Suit, we generally picture a rugged manly type chopped down a tree or something in red long underwear. Red, by the way, became and still is the most popular color. Why red? Because if a man were to find himself in some distress out in the wild he could strip down to your alarm-red underwear for better visibility.
In my historical novels I like the get my heroines out of their corsets as soon as possible.
Here is an excerpt from my upcoming historical western romance, His Unexpected Companion.
Excerpt:
Olivia Darling is her own woman—self-sufficient, intelligent, and wise to the ways of the world. She’s also beautiful enough to rile other women and garner unwanted attention from men, which could bring more danger down on her than living the outlaw life she’s taken to. Headed home to Colorado, she’s ready to put her past behind her—but what kind of reception will she get?
Kit Traver is headed home to Colorado, giving up his law practice back East to return to the place he loves—and the woman he intends to marry. His life neatly planned, this journey will give him the time he needs to be alone with nature before he takes on the responsibilities of practicing law again and being a married man.
When Kit and Olivia meet in Denver, it’s not the best first impression—for either of them. But, they are traveling the same trail, so it’s only natural they ride along together. It’s obvious to Kit that Olivia needs his protection—if only from herself!
But traveling together ignites a fire between them that can’t be ignored, especially once they arrive, only to discover that everything has changed while they’ve been away. With her father mysteriously murdered, Olivia has her hands full trying to keep the big ranchers from pushing her off her family’s small spread. Can Olivia and Kit make a home together? Will Kit walk away from his socialite family for the love of HIS UNEXPECTED COMPANION?
There was a video floating around not long ago showing how a woman dressed back then. Honestly, I got claustrophobia watching it. So constricting! I don't know how they could stand it lol.
ReplyDeleteI did see that video! Crazy. And you imagine the laundry chore! Thank heavens for spandex and polar fleece. Thanks for stopping by.
DeleteI love the obscure histories, so this post was an absolute delight. I did a post on how women historically coped with menstruation, and the red version of the union suit was originally aimed at women using them during their periods. As you say, what started as a practicality for staining, became picked up by men for other reasons.
ReplyDeleteOh, wow, I never came across that fact about red union suits and menstruation! Now, that makes more sense. I always enjoy your posts but must have missed that one. Thanks for reading!
ReplyDeleteInteresting post, thanks. Also interesting detail about union suits, C.A. I can't imagine laundering and ironings all those garments with the tools of the time. Glad to be living in current times with jeans and tee shirts.
ReplyDeleteRight?! I'm old enough to remember when girls had to wear dresses or skirts to school, and how it felt the year we were allowed to wear pants! I remember feeling less vulnerable and more inclined to be active. I can't imagine how restrictive going about my day in a corset would have been like? Thanks for stopping by!
DeleteI love the way you complement your research with the excerpt from your book. I am so going to love reading it. I love it when a strong, spirited and intelligent woman can gobsmack the hero and yet he's man enough to appreciate her uniqueness.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Elizabeth you nailed it exactly! They are well-matched couple. He has a strength beneath his gentile upbringing that she brings out. Glad you stopped by!
DeleteFascinating information and a great excerpt. Thanks for this, Patti.
ReplyDeleteThank you! I'm glad you stopped by and enjoyed.
DeleteIsn't it amazing how much clothing plays a part in the lives of people? Thank you for the additional history. As you know, I love this kind of informations. Also loved the excerpt. Doris
ReplyDeleteThanks, Doris! I often think about how clothes shape us. As I said in an earlier comment, I remember when girls couldn't wear pants to school. When that day arrived was so liberating
DeletePatti,
ReplyDeleteIt was second semester of my 10th grade year when girls were finally allowed to wear pants in my school district (public school). But, we al still had to wear the same blue, zipper-up-the front shorts-jumpsuits for P.E. bleh.
I'm right there with you in having the heroine shed her restrictive clothing whenever possible and historically feasible.
Sounds like we had the same gym suits! Except ours had snaps up the front (just thinking about them, I remember the smell of gym lockers!). We wore shorts under our dresses because recess was a nightmare with the boys trying to look under our skirts!I'm glad you stopped by!
Delete