![]() |
| Image - Morguefile.com |
As an author, a question I occasionally encounter is, “Why do you write stories with historical settings instead of contemporary stories?”
My superficial answer is I’m drawn to the Old West, Roaring Twenties, and 1950s, because I'm a history nerd with a particular interest in these time periods, and also because writing stories in any historical setting feeds my nerdiness.
The serious reasons are these.
Reason 1—Research
Every historical I write allows me to tumble down research rabbit holes. I’ve discovered the most intriguing and amazing tidbits of history in my research Wonderland. It’s important to me to have the details in my stories as historically accurate, but I temper the accuracy with the need to tell a good story. I am, after all, writing fiction as entertainment, not creating a historical documentary.
![]() |
| Image Fotolia.com |
Reason 2—Living vicariously in the past
While I’m writing a story set in the past, I get to travel to a different place and time and live in someone else’s shoes and view the world through their eyes and perspectives. I’m like Anthony Marston in Quigley Down Under: “…Some men [women] are born in the wrong century.” I’m on an adventure that can take me anywhere I want to go.
![]() |
| Alan Rickman | Anthony Marston - Image courtesy IMDb |
Reason 3—Challenge of overcoming inconveniences
I like writing stories that lack modern day conveniences. Without the amenities we’re accustomed to nowadays, there are so many juicy complications for the characters to face, deal with, and overcome that otherwise could be written away with a call on the cell phone or by hopping an airplane.
I get a little giddy imagining the possibilities...
*Contraception: Without our modern-day contraceptives, the possibility of pregnancy looms in historical stories as an ever-present consequence of a romantic dalliance. This is a great plot device for building the emotional tension between the hero and heroine. Fear of out-of-wedlock pregnancy and the real threat of dying in childbirth both add another layer of anxiety to the romantic relationship.
*Communication: When the hero and heroine have to depend upon letter writing and telegraph messages, both of which were slow (relatively speaking) and could more easily be intercepted or even lost, the villain has the opportunity to weasel his way into the heroine’s life and console her. Perhaps the heroine thinks the hero jilted her at the altar when he doesn’t show up for their wedding when actually the villain intercepted the telegram, which explains the legitimate reason for the hero’s delay.
![]() |
| Morse Key and Sounder image courtesy Wikipedia HERE |
*Transportation: Transportation wasn’t necessarily convenient or terribly comfortable. Horseback riding was functional, but for long periods of time over great distances is exhausting and full of plot-enhancing dangers and challenges. Stagecoach travel was cramped, dirty/dusty, really hot/really cold, and could be dangerous. It lacked privacy that women need. Obtaining a decent meal could be an on-going problem. Generally, stage travel was a grueling test of endurance. Traveling by train was limited to where the tracks were laid, and it shared many of the same drawbacks as stage travel, plus the additional discomfort of soot and cinders coming into the passenger cars. After all, the heroine might be kidnapped by a drop-dead handsome train robber or find herself stranded on the Texas prairie with nothing but a scoundrel of a gambler as her companion along with the one surviving horse from the stagecoach team after the Comanche attack.
![]() |
| Image - Fotolia.com |
My questions to you...
Authors of historical romances: What would you add? What draws you to your historical writing?
Readers of historical romances: What is it about historical romances appeals to you?
Until next time,
Kaye Spencer
Stay in contact with Kaye





































