Isabella Macduff Comyn's life was not a happy one.
It didn't start happy. And in spite of one bright shining moment in time,
it didn't end happy.
Isabella Macduff, heir to the earldom of
Fife and countess of Buchan by marriage, was born at Methil, Fifeshire,
Scotland sometime around 1275-80 to the 3rd earl of Fife, Donnchadh Macduff, and his English wife, Johanna de Clare, daughter
of Gilbert de Clare, 7th earl of Gloucester and 6th earl
of Hertford (He later divorced his first wife and married Edward Plantagenet’s
sister). By hapchance, Isabella was also
a cousin to two very powerful men, both Scottish earls—one she married by a
king's decree, and one she made a king.
A pretty Scots lass with bright red hair, the poor lass was but a pawn
in the center of games of power and building kingdoms. I seriously doubt anyone ever asked Isabella what she wanted out of life—not in childhood, not
in her teen years, and certainly not in her final years as a woman.
Macduff Castle
Isabella's father was a vicious man; hence
few were hardly surprised when in 1289 while on his way to Dunfermline, the
earl was murdered at Pittillock by his own clansmen. In fear, the English Johanna de Clare took
her son (Isabella’s younger brother, Duncan) and fled to England where the two
were welcomed warmly by Edward I. Oddly,
Isabella, not even eight-years-old, was left behind to be raised in Scotland—possibly
because she was the eldest child, and in old Pictish tradition, was the heir of
her father, and with that in mind, clan Macduff was not about to let her leave
clan control. Little is recorded of her
upbringing. My heart breaks thinking of
young Isabella living alone, men governing her life, her destiny, while her
mother and brother thrived lavishly at the English Court.
By decree of Edward I, king of England, and
papal dispensation since they were cousins, Isabella was married in her teens to John Black Comyn, 3rd earl of Buchan, a man
over twenty years her senior. John was
the head of one of the most powerful families in Scotland. The son of Alexander Comyn, 2nd earl of
Buchan, he was also nephew to John Balliol, king of Scotland. His sister was
the valiant Marjorie Comyn, countess of Dunbar and March, about whom I have previously
written. In Comyn marrying the heiress
of another influential clan—this time the ancient one of Macduff—you see a pattern
repeated for centuries by Comyn males.
They married heiresses, in their own right, drawing these powerful
holdings into the Comyn honours, ever
increasing and widening their power base and control of the northern half of
Scotland. It’s hard to judge, outside
the prestige and lands that Isabella brought to the union, if John cared for
his young bride. They were wed in 1290,
the same year as John’s father died, making him the 3rd earl of
Buchan, but it was seven years later before Isabella produced their first
child—a daughter she named Isabel. I am
reasonably sure John resented Isabella hadn’t produced a son and heir. History almost ignores the existence of this
daughter, and it’s clear John certainly tried.
However, documents in Edward II’s daily papers dated 3rd December 1308 make references of the female
child’s presence, controlling her future and lands, and later, a marriage to
the son of Reginald le Chayne, Justiciar
of Scotia, so there is little denying her place in history.
Inverlocky Castle, a Comyn stronghold
During the Scottish War for Independence, the Comyns—backers of John Balliol
(their cousin and uncle)—led the Scottish host at Dunbar, fighting against King
Edward. In spite, they were smart enough:
they had half of the clan support Balliol, while the other half stayed home or
rode with the English. John, on the side
fighting against Longshanks, was captured and sent to the Tower of London as
prisoner in April 1296. Regardless, Edward was always quick to make peace where
it benefitted him. He was planning an
invasion of France, and thus needed the most influential clan in Scotland on
his side and to supply him men and coin.
After the Scottish defeat, and time as prisoner in the Tower of London,
you see the earl of Buchan pledging allegiance to Longshanks and reclaiming his
lands. John’s name was on the Ragman Roll in August 1296 at Berwick,
swearing his fealty to Edward:
Comyn comes de Bouchan, Dominus Johannes
(Johan Comyn comte de Bouchan)
There’s no mention of Isabella being with
him. Likely, she was pregnant, and since
it was one of the hottest and driest summers ever, and conditions of Berwick on
Edward's command saw bodies from the 3-day sack back in April still lying,
rotting on the ground, John might not have wanted to risk Isabella losing the
baby. In my first Challon novel, A Restless Knight, I make reference to
these vile conditions, when Julian and Tamlyn were summoned to Berwick, and how
this situation was deliberately created by Edward’s orders to force the
nobility of Scotland to witness what happened to a town when they defied him.
Outside the date of birth of her daughter,
Isabella was largely ignored by history at this point. Just
another woman given in marriage as a reward to a powerful lord. Only, the
battle of cousins would soon shape her destiny, and forevermore forge her
name into the legend and lore of Scotland.
Her husband’s cousin (and yes, her cousin, too) was also named John Comyn— John Comyn III
of Badenoch, called John the Red or Red Comyn. In the vacuum of Longshanks removing John
Balliol from the throne of Scotland, the Comyns assumed control of the northern
two-thirds of the country—ruling in Balliol’s name—of course. Red Comyn, after
all, was the grandson of Balliol. However,
as time passed, the mighty Comyn men began to see there would be no hope for
returning Toom Taber—the nickname
Longshanks hung on Balliol after stripping him of ceremonial regalia of
Scotland—ever be king again. The empty
throne saw the eyes of both John Comyns on
that prize.
John "Red" Comyn, Lord Badenoch
Still, they weren’t the only ones with the
same desire—another cousin—Robert de
Brus (Bruce), the young earl of Carrick, possessed that very dream in his heart
and was resolute to undo the crowning of Balliol in 1292. The Bruces had firmly believed Edward I would
rule in favor of Robert’s grandfather, the 5th lord of Annandale
instead of Balliol. After all, the man
had been designated as heir by decree
by King Alexander II at one point. Since
Alexander had produced no sons, he placed the eldest Bruce in the line of
succession as heir presumptive in
1238, and he was to follow the king should anything happen to him. A heartbeat away from the dazzling prospect
of being sovereign of the Scots created a fire in Annandale, which carried over
to his son the 6th lord, and now the same hunger grew inside Robert
Bruce, the grandson. Robert was raised
tri-lingual, considered one of three men as the first knights of Christendom, had
been polished in courtly ways, educated in diplomacy, handsome, arrogant, yet
smart enough to play a waiting game—and filled with the belief God intended him
to be Scotland’s king.
Some consider the triumph at the Battle of Stirling Bridge was more a
victory under the guidance of Sir Andrew de Moray of Bothwell than William
Wallace. Moray died of wounds sustained
in the battle, so the credit went and still goes to Wallace. That assumption of Moray's military
brilliance is upheld for at the Battle of
Falkirk, when Wallace led the Scottish army alone, the battle had been
lost. After the defeat, Wallace resigned
as Guardian of Scotland and left the country.
In an effort to balance the power, both Red Comyn and Robert Bruce were
named Co-Guardians of Scotland.
Since both men were single-minded to wear
the crown of the Scots, the idea of them working together was doomed from the
outset. One incident clearly
demonstrates how impossible the situation was between the two men. At a meeting after Wallace resigned, a
knight—Sir David Graham—a Comyn supporter, demanded the lands of Wallace be
forfeit and given to him since Wallace had left the country without the permission
of the Guardians. Wallace's brother—Sir
Malcolm Wallace—refuted this claim. He
knew his brother was actually on a mission for Bishop Wishart in France, and
then on to Italy, trying to bring the King of France and the Pope to side with
the Scots against the king of England.
Bruce ruled in favor of Malcolm Wallace.
This in turn set David Graham and Malcolm Wallace to fighting with more
than words. Out of the blue, Red Comyn leapt
for the throat of Bruce and began strangling him! James Stuart, 5th High Steward of Scotland,
and others had to drag Red Comyn away from Bruce. Soon after, Comyn refused to be a Guardian if
Bruce remained one; then Bruce said there was no working with Comyn, and quit
in 1300.
There is an old Scottish saying: the enemy of my enemy is my friend. That was never so proven as in this time in Scotland’s history. The Bruces had been firmly in Edward's camp, while the Comyns were on the Scottish side backing John Balliol, their kinsman. Edward felt he held control over young Robert. Not surprising since the king had even gifted Robert with a new bride—Elizabeth de Burgh, Edward’s goddaughter. Only, like many ruthless monarchs through the ages, Edward was growing suspicious of his councilors. And though he showed great favoritism toward Robert–even paying his debts when Bruce lands had been seized for refusing to pay fealty to John Balliol—he was increasingly mistrustful about the loyalties of both Bruces. After Edward removed Balliol, Robert's father, Lord Annandale prodded Longshanks to rectify his mistake by placing him on the throne. Edward was said to sneer and reply that he had better things to do than win a kingdom for Annandale. Ever since, Edward held the Bruces close, yet never fully trusted them. And in the case of being paranoid doesn't mean that someone isn't out to get you—Robert was working behind the scenes against Edward's interest.
(yeah, it's Patrick McGoohan playing Longshanks, but I think he did him so well)
Around 1305, Robbie had entered into secret
negotiations with Red Comyn—a deal, that they help each other. Not one
of Bruce’s brighter plans! One would
resign their claim to the kingship, leaving the path clear for the other to
seize the crown. In return, the one
giving up the claim would receive all the lands and titles of the other. Comyn
had another idea. Through the
backdoor came Red Comyn, plotting to make another deal for the crown. He turned over these letters from Robert,
outlining the details of their pact, in which Comyn basically agreed to step aside
so Robert could be crowned king. Instead,
Comyn saw this as the perfect opportunity to eliminate his competition.
Unable to contain his fury, the king
confronted Robert with the letters and asked if he had written them—after all
it had the Carrick seal upon the documents.
I am sure Robert was furious by the betrayal, but he kept his head. He replied yes it was one of his seals. Deftly,
he pulled on a chain about his neck and produced his official sigil. He went on to explain the seal affixed to the
paper was one, but an older seal that
he’d left at his castle in Scotland, and protested someone surely had stolen it
and was using the wax sigil to frame him.
Bruce vowed to get to the bottom of who was the real traitor. Storming out, the Bruce and his entourage
headed to his manor house in Tottenham.
Barely an hour passed, when someone knocked on the door to Bruce’s
room. The man held up his finger to his
lips to signal silence, then handed Robert a spur and a gold coin with the face
of Edward Longshanks upon it. The message was clear. Arrest warrants had been issued by the
English king to seize Robert and his brothers.
Riding hard, the men of Bruce headed to
Scotland, escaping arrest by barely an hour. He and his party happened upon a messenger
wearing the colors of Red Comyn. The men pursued the fleeing rider and dispatched
him. On his body were more letters written by Robert to Red Comyn, and now were
being sent to Edward Longshanks.
Once in Scotland, Robert arranged one last
meeting with Red Comyn, determined to have it out with the man who was his
enemy. With Bruce were Roger de Kirkpatrick
of Fleming and Sir Christopher Seton, another powerful noble, who just weeks
before had married Bruce's younger sister, Christian. At Dumfries church, Bruce confronted Comyn
with the captured letters that were being dispatched to Longshanks. Just as he had at their meeting over William
Wallace's lands, when Comyn tried to strangle Robert, Comyn struck out. Someone—either Comyn or his uncle, Sir Roger
Comyn, landed a blow with a sword across Robert's chest—his chain mail saving
his life. Robert desperately reached for
his long dirk, hidden in the side of his cross-laced boot.
When the fight was over, Red Comyn and his
uncle, Sir Robert, lay wounded. Robert
staggered outside, and told Seton that he had stabbed Comyn, but it was only a
flesh wound. As his brother-in-law
helped Bruce up and onto the saddle of his horse, Kirkpatrick rushed into the
church and killed Comyn. When Kirkpatrick
came out and confessed Comyn was now dead, Robert knew there would be no
turning back. It was all or nothing. Robert
proceeded with haste through Scotland to Scone Palace where he would be crowned
King of the Scots.
Miles away, Robert's cousin, Isabella, was
unaware of these men’s matters. Her
husband John was away in England. One
can infer John Comyn, earl of Buchan was in England with purpose—he was the one
who carried the first letters and gave them to Longshanks. The messenger that the Bruces had intercepted,
bearing more letters, was intended for Buchan.
Isabella knew nothing of the Comyn’s plots and plans, or how it would
soon propel her young life toward a moment of defiance and victory, and then
into the nightmare that would follow.
There was all speed to crown Robert as king
before word of what happened would cause all of clan Comyn to hunt him
down. In 1296, Edward had removed or destroyed
all Scottish regalia—or so he thought—his
intent to prevent the pomp and circumstance for placing a crown on a new
Scottish king.
Six weeks after Comyn had been killed in
Dumfries, Bruce was crowned king of the Scots by Bishop William de Lamberton at
Scone on Palm Sunday 25th of March 1306, with all formality and
solemnity. Royal robes and vestments that Robert Wishart had hidden from the
English a decade before were brought out by the bishop and set upon King
Robert. The bishops of Moray and Glasgow were in attendance, as were the earls
of Atholl, Menteith, Lennox and Mar. The great banner of the kings of Scotland
was planted behind Bruce's throne. Only,
they lacked the one thing that every monarch of Scotland had had in their
coronation—the earl of Fife putting the crown on the head of the new king.
Since her lord husband was still in
England, she took his valuable destriers, and nearly rode them into the ground,
trying to get to Robert in time. When
she reached Scone, it was to her disappointment that she arrived one day too
late. However, wanting to cement the
Bruce’s rights as king, Lamberton suggested they redo the crowning, a second
one, two days after the first. So, Isabella, as the true countess of Fife and
Buchan placed the crown on Robert Bruce, earl of Carrick, sealing his destiny
as the new king of the Scots.
Isabella had just crowned the man
responsible for the death of her cousin, Red Comyn, a man who was also cousin
to her husband. Worse, her husband was with the English king at the time she
was crowning the Bruce, the embarrassment of the deed must have burned inside
of John. To add to the insult—she had
taken his five destriers and driven them hard to reach Scone. Not just any old horse, mind, these were a
knight’s shod chargers, animals valued at $15,000-$25,000 at that period. When jousting, the winning knight claimed a ransom from the loser. Generally, it was their armor or their destrier. Knights often paid these prices to get their
mounts back. You didn’t ride a destrier from
place-to-place like a regular horse. Knights
rode palfreys for conveyance, and had trained horsemen to lead the valuable
destriers to destinations. Think of them
as the Lamborghinis of horses! She had driven these valuable animals hard to
get to Scone, hardly stopping for food and water. Such treatment could cause the animals to
founder—a condition where the horses could never bear a rider again.
By coming to Scone, Isabella forevermore
cut ties to her husband and Clan Comyn.
Bruce recognized this, too. He
knew Clan Comyn was coming for him, and soon it would be summer and Edward I
would, once again, bring forth his army—nearly a summer event—the invasion of
Scotland by Edward Longshanks. Isabella
had to go with the Bruce entourage to safeguard her life.
And come
for Bruce, they did. Edward had
received word, and vowed to ride north to avenge Comyn’s death. Only age and infirmities were beginning to
take a toll upon the king, too long a warrior.
The whole country wanted Bruce’s head.
However, the Scottish church, long backers of the rebellion, remained
steadfastly at Robert’s back. He sent
for his brother Nigel to fetch his queen, his small daughter, two sisters, Mary
and Christian, and the countess of Buchan, and placed them in the care of
Kildrummy Castle after he learnt the earl of Pembroke’s army approached.
Christian’s first husband was Gartnait, earl of Mar, and she had raised their twin
daughters at Kildrummy. Also, Bruce was
originally married to Gartnait’s sister, Isabel, and thus his daughter,
Marjorie was half Mar blood. The people
there would remain loyal to them. In the
end, they were forced to flee the castle.
Poor Christian’s second husband, Sir Christopher Seton, was captured
aiding her brother to escape after the Battle
of Dalrigh. For his valiant defense
of the Bruce women and for saving Bruce’s life, Sir Christopher was hanged,
drawn and quartered by the English along with Nigel Bruce.
Ruins of Kildrummy Castle
In a final desperate move, the Bruce women
were given safe passage by John of Strathbogie, 9th earl of Atholl, with the
intent to get the women to the Orkneys. Bruce’s sister, Isabel, had married King
Eric of Norway, and she was now queen there. They made it as far as the
sanctuary of St. Duthac at Tain in Easter Ross. There, they were captured by a
Balliol supporter, William earl of Ross, who handed them over to Edward’s men. (Odd side note—Bruce would wed another of his
sisters, Maud, to Aodh 0'Beoland scarcely
two years later. Aodh was the son of the
earl of Ross!). For his role in
protecting the Bruce women, Atholl was killed, burnt and his head later set on
a pike on London Bridge.
Edward was ever a ruthless king, but in his
dealing with the women of Bruce he showed just how merciless he was. Elizabeth de Burgh’s fate was most
lenient—after all Edward was her godfather and he had arranged the marriage
with Robert Bruce. Her father was
Edward’s closest friend, Richard de Burgh, earl of Ulster, a powerful man. Edward needed his support. So, she was placed in a string of different
castles under guard, prisoner for nearly eight years. However, she lacked for nothing, including her
favorite Irish wolfhounds at her side.
The other women of Bruce didn’t fare so
well. Christian was sent to a Gilbertine
nunnery at Sixhills in Lincolnshire, England.
She was held in a large cage in a room, and not allowed to see anyone,
save a single attendant and mother superior to attend to her spiritual needs. It was puzzling Christian’s fate was milder
than that of her niece and sister. I can
only assume since she was the widow of the earls of Mar and Seton, Edward didn’t
wish to anger those clans against him.
It was with Mary Bruce, Marjorie Bruce and
the countess Buchan where he displayed a most ‘peculiar ferocity’. He
instructed the three women would be held in cages. He drew up specific designs for them. From Francis Palgrave, Letters of Privy Seal
were sent to the Chamberlain of Scotland that he should make cages in the
turrets of various royal castles, so they could be hung over the side, and with
especially harsh words for Isabella:
Orders originally had been for little
Marjorie Bruce to be held in one of these horrid prison. The cage was constructed. But evidently, someone finally swayed
Edward's anger long enough to reason that putting a child of barely 10 years
old in a cage would be too much for Scots to stomach. She was sent to a convent in Watton instead.
Mary was unmarried, not blessed with a
well-connected husband, so I assume Edward felt leave to come down so harshly
on her. She was caged in his iron and
wood prison on the wall of Roxbury Castle.
Poor Isabella had crowned Robert king of
the Scots. And she was married to one of
the most powerful men in Scotland—who now held favor with the English
king. You might expect her husband to
intercede on her behalf, beg for a less harsh treatment. John did nothing. In fact, some historians attributed him
saying she needed executing. Attempts to
secure her release were made by Sir Robert Keith and Sir John Mowbray, by appealing
to Duncan, earl of Fife—her younger brother—but the appeals came to naught. Duncan was too happy being the absentee earl,
living high at English Court with his mother, grandfather and new
step-grandmother—the king’s own sister.
Her cage was
built as a front to a turret, and within was a privy so she could dress and
relieve herself without exposing her body to the hecklers gathering and often
tossing things at her. However, she was forced
to be out in all weather and on display for all to see, but not allowed to speak
to anyone. There is some debate as to
whether the women were kept in the open.
Edward’s own commands tell a story otherwise.
Why did Edward Longshanks treat these women in such a vile manner? Perhaps it was a challenge to the Bruce to come try to snatch them from their captivity. Or he might have been doing an in your face to Robert: These are the women under your protection and you are helpless to save them. The Bruce women were prisoners of the English for nearly eight years, and long after Edward I had died. Some writings of the period, speak that Mary and Isabella were removed from their cages after four years and in 1310 were relocated to nunneries. Mary eventually went on to be returned to her brother in a prisoner exchange under Edward II.
Henry Beaumont had an
unsavory reputation, and was closely aligned to Piers Gaveston the ‘favorite’ of Edward II–a man Edward
Longshanks exiled because of the closeness of his son and Gaveston. Henry and his sister had also been banished
from English Court by the Ordainers at the same time as Gaveston for debauched and
depraved behavior. His personal battle
to hang onto the title of earl of Buchan grew to legend. The title was only valid in England—because
in Scotland King Robert refused to confirm Alice and Henry. Beaumont’s battle to regain possession of the
earldom was such an obsession that he helped overturn the peace between England
and Scotland established by the Treaty of Northampton, and brought about the Second
War of Scottish Independence, simply to satisfy his single-minded desire to be earl of Buchan, in
his own right. There is little doubt in
my mind that Isabella was murdered sometime after her release to Beaumont. If he was willing to destroy the peace
between two countries merely to hold onto a title that never really was his,
disposing of a weakened woman, who had no champion, would’ve hardly caused
Henry Beaumont to blink. At one point,
he pushed the powerful Edmund of Woodstock, 1st earl of Kent (half-brother to
Edward II) to start a rebellion to put his sibling back on the throne of
England—one problem Edward II was already dead!. Henry knew this, but it shows the lengths he
would go to merely to claim the title to Buchan.
ReplyDeleteWOW!!! What a fabulous post!!! I was really looking forward to Part 2 and it certainly didn't disappoint!!! What a lot of work you put into making it so interesting and informative!!! Such fascinating information that makes you want to keep reading more and more!!! This post is like gifting the reader with a whole book! The lovely pictures you included are gorgeous too! I can't wait for your next post to read more!!! Keep them coming!!! :)
The Women of Bruce series will go on to several more blogs. His wives, his daughter and sisters. I would love to do one on his mistresses, but oddly, and unlike many other royal bastards, little is recorded on the mothers of his five illegitimate children. They were recognized as his by him, and he provided titles and lands to each. But you just get speculation and little else about their mothers.
ReplyDeleteAs always a fascinating read. I'm always saddened at the plight of these early women. Yet ...
ReplyDeleteDoris
Thank you. These blogs contain a lot of my own research, which either fills in some of the gaps or goes against the old boys with school ties, but I am tired of women getting the slight in history. Isabella's story touched me deeply because at every stage in history no one seemed to care what she wanted. Not her father, mother, husband, kings...especially not greedy in-laws. But for that one special shard of time, she seize the chance to do what was in her heart.
DeleteIn case you are familiar with some of Isabella's story, I didn't address rumors that she and Bruce were lovers, and that is why she she was determined to crown him. While Bruce did have many lovers, and those children he recognised and made nobility with titles and lands, I just don't find any evidence of Isabella being one of them. Her grandfather Gilbert de Clare and Bruce's grandmother Isabel de Clare were brother and sister, making them cousins. But she married a cousin. Why I just feel she wasn't his lover was I doubt he would have included her in the Bruce women along with his wife. Last thing that stuck with me, was the rumors seemed to come for modern times, and not from the period.
ReplyDeleteI always love your posts, so full of detail. I was taught our history at school, but it always concentrated on the male side. When I was first taught about the outdoor cages as a child, I wondered how that was survivable in Scottish weather, as the winters are so bleak. I still wonder. I did take paused at the notion that Bruce was handsome, but I suppose that just having regular features made you stand out back then. The Huntarian recreated his face from a cast of his skull. You'd probably be interested in that.He was Norman, who were basically Vikings who settled in France, and he was as typically square, and broad as they are.
ReplyDeleteyes, the Norman is indicated in the original last name of de Brus. Bruce's 4th great grandfather through Isbaelle Huntington line to King Henry I of France. Same line goes back to Ælfflæd "Elfleda" of Northumbria and Sigvard Earl of Northumbria. On his father's side he goes back to Sigurd "the Stout" earl of Orkney (Viking earl being closer to king), but the most interesting Dunbar direct line is to Malcolm "Mael Coluim, King of Scotland" MacAlpin, who was grandson of the Pictish King and Queen. So yes, Norman and Viking, but original Pictish blood as well.
ReplyDeleteI don't give 100% credence to the reconstruction from his bones. There are small variances, judgement calls, so end result is part artist's vision. Small tweaks could make a difference. Just as the representation of Richard III leaned to more effeminate than any of his portraits. THey did one with Richard as blonde and another with dark hair.
Yes, the science on reconstruction has moved on exponentially of late. Having seen what they do with murder victims, I think the latest may be closest. But as you say, who knows? Sometimes attractiveness is more a twinkle in the eyes, or quick wit. The Scots have a record of being brutally honest though, and neither he, nor Wallace, were recorded as being good-looking, while others were. One intriguing description of Bruce said he had, "red bleared eyes, the colour of sandalwood." Forgetting the 'bleared', as he had leprosy, that's an unusual colour right there!
DeleteThe Huntarian one was done from the casting of a casting, I believe. Christian Corbet's was done from what was said to be the original casting, and his team of renowned forensic experts (some who worked on Nefertiti, did one about five years ago that came out rather different. Closer set eyes, long thinner nose. I am sure with your background, you might know more about if the casting of a casting could make a difference, etc. But the two are rather different in images, that leave me, a Doubting Thomas not buying 100% for either castings.
DeleteYes, they are pretty "close" but that shift that comes down to the artist vision can make a difference. I see a lot of the ones they do on murder victims, and they are close. But often don't quite hit the mark. Just being off 10% or even 5% can make a big difference in end result. People say I look a lot like my mother. I am sure if you did reconstructions of our skulls, the end result would come out similar, and yet it could favor the mother more than the daughter. Yes, alike but not alike.
ReplyDeleteOdd, I have found references to the Bruce men being handsome, even back to writings about his grandfather the Competitor. I always had an image of him being an elder man, whose time was gone. So when you come across writing describing him as strong and handsome, I had to stop and shift my mental image.
Yes, the reconstruction did one with signs of leprosy and one without, giving both sides of that argument their own version. The leprosy had to be mild, likely being more draining in strength that what we normally think as lepers, and they did reflect that in their end result.
Yes, I totally agree the interpretation makes all the difference. I find it fascinating that he can get a glimpse of their faces, or even an approximation. They did say they were hampered by a lack of DNA too, as they've learned so much, they now inform the reconstructions too. IMO (for whatever that's worth, lol) Hew Morrison in Dundee and Adrie and Alfons Kennis are true masters of the craft and science. Although, as you say, it's only an approximation.
DeleteYes, the skull was sealed in pitch before the original cast was made. I am assuming (you would know more about that area than I) that hurt the chances of the DNA being preserved. There was supposedly a toe bone they found in the destructed grave and were hoping to get DNA from, but feared damaged makes that unlikely. Of course, he left a LOT of descendants, so it's possible to get close to him through the children. Bruce's newest image, shows sheared off hair. Even discounting their stronger features than the Corbet's version, hair can made a big difference. I recall one guy who kept a buzz cut and I wouldn't give him the time of day. Then one time I run into a few years later and he had longer hair and it really transformed his looks! I would love to see the newest one done with longer hair, maybe two version -- his as king, and him as warrior.
DeleteArchaeology and the forensic side of it, are making so many leaps and bounds. I am guessing the discoveries in the last decades has been more than the last 300 years combined.
Another point about small variances making a big difference...I grew extremely ill in the 1990s, couldn't exercise etc, so gained weight. I had my driver's license done at that time. By three wears later, I was doing better, and lost weight and was back to exercising. People using the license as an ID would say "there is something wrong, this is your mother's license." So simple things like weight can make a difference. Thanks for the nattering, I love exploring topics like this, but I usually bore someone to death. LOL
DeleteYou're more than welcome. I love it too.
Deletewriters and research....totally fascinating.
Deletehttps://www.facebook.com/societyofjohndegraeme/videos/166074095420608 This is a new version thatthe Society of John Graeme has done to put the images to animation to make it come alive. I think when you see this, you can understand how a face with life behind it becomes handsome.
DeleteFascinating as always, Deborah, and a stunning corrective to the very male-centric versions of history. Thank you
ReplyDeleteThank you. I think what got the burr under my saddle in starting the series was a friend was doing her family tree at her father's request. When she had gone by so many generations, she showed the work to him and he was upset. She had bother to include the females. He ordered her to go back and redo the tree and omit the females!! Very old man, but it really showed the male arrogance that only men count in history. If it wasn't for women, none of them would be around. :-)
ReplyDeleteUg. How very male entitled!
ReplyDeleteQuite. You can also see another male practice of dismissing women. When you have several sons and daughters listed for a man, historians will list the sons first, then daughters, so it appears many sons were first born, when actually they could be the third or fourth child. You often see Robert Bruce referred to as the eldest child of Lord Annandale, when he was actually the fourth. First son, but fourth child.
DeleteThank you for bringing my 22nd great-grandmother to life. Her courage is inspiring in the face of so many cruel people and events in her life.
ReplyDelete